Exeter Princesshay

may I congratulate the Echo, January 26, and Mike Byrne in particular for his exclusive on the Princesshay camera ban. This is an appalling state of affairs but is only the tip of the iceberg.Have I got the message wrong but is Exeter meant to be attempting to prevent global warming. So what do the planners allow to be constructed. Look for yourself. I went through Princesshay noting the number of stores who had their doors wide open and central heating systems blasting hot air into the street. Now if they had built Princesshay as an enclosed precinct as in Plymouth then the hot air would have been retained and not lost. Furthermore, readers will notice that, as an example, Boots and Marks & Spencer have sliding automatic doors which allow easy access and exit. Why were the Princesshay stores not built with automatic sliding doors.There appears to be no solar panels,and no wind turbines. Why, because I think that yet again Exeter has taken the cheapest option. They have sold out to corporate Britain and mammon. With all the wasted energy is it any wonder that bags have to be sold for £800 as was reported when Princesshay opened. Princesshay is already outdated and not sustainable as we enter the second great depression.