Big Brother and the Holding Company
I think that in some strange way this Blog is actually coming up with some way in which Cameron and the Tories, with Osborne can actually 'win' the next election when it is held in the spring.
'It's interesting that since hammering it in this blog that "reality" has risen up the agenda and surveys are showing that this is where the voter's minds are at. This is why I say the party that will "win" the next election is the first party to "lose" the election. By liberating themselves from "winning" politicians "get real" and strike political gold'.
The problem will be that Cameron is going to have to change quite a lot, or alternatively stop being something which he isn't. I like to think that I have been in 'the real world' for some time, but friendless for obvious reasons, they always shoot the messenger.
I would point out that Pareto has been mentioned in earlier despatches, may I suggest that two other elitist theoriticians should also be looked up, namely Mosca and Michels. May I humbly suggest that we are soon going to be faced with some choices, either a Marxist regime not communist, an Anarchist regime Proudhon, or alternatively a fascist regime like Mussolini's Italy in the late twenties.
We are soon to have a very disillusioned military, where there will be proof that their 'mates' died for nothing, where the politicians, like in Northern Ireland will talk to the enemy and reach agreements and settlements, just like after WWI.
Victory at the next election will be for the party, or individuals, who organise themselves the best, just as Obama managed to organise his key workers in America. That is the key, get them on the streets, working in little cells and influencing people. Consider how the Bolsheviks were victorious in Russia after the chaos of the Great War, they had been planning the take-over for years.
It is not capitalism which is coming to an end it is Participatory Representative Democracy which is coming to an end, we do indeed live in interesting times. If the government was serious about the long term nationalisation of the banks then they would have memebers selected by the government on the board, not operating through an arms length Holding Company. Maybe it ought to be called the Big Brother Holding Company?
'It's interesting that since hammering it in this blog that "reality" has risen up the agenda and surveys are showing that this is where the voter's minds are at. This is why I say the party that will "win" the next election is the first party to "lose" the election. By liberating themselves from "winning" politicians "get real" and strike political gold'.
The problem will be that Cameron is going to have to change quite a lot, or alternatively stop being something which he isn't. I like to think that I have been in 'the real world' for some time, but friendless for obvious reasons, they always shoot the messenger.
I would point out that Pareto has been mentioned in earlier despatches, may I suggest that two other elitist theoriticians should also be looked up, namely Mosca and Michels. May I humbly suggest that we are soon going to be faced with some choices, either a Marxist regime not communist, an Anarchist regime Proudhon, or alternatively a fascist regime like Mussolini's Italy in the late twenties.
We are soon to have a very disillusioned military, where there will be proof that their 'mates' died for nothing, where the politicians, like in Northern Ireland will talk to the enemy and reach agreements and settlements, just like after WWI.
Victory at the next election will be for the party, or individuals, who organise themselves the best, just as Obama managed to organise his key workers in America. That is the key, get them on the streets, working in little cells and influencing people. Consider how the Bolsheviks were victorious in Russia after the chaos of the Great War, they had been planning the take-over for years.
It is not capitalism which is coming to an end it is Participatory Representative Democracy which is coming to an end, we do indeed live in interesting times. If the government was serious about the long term nationalisation of the banks then they would have memebers selected by the government on the board, not operating through an arms length Holding Company. Maybe it ought to be called the Big Brother Holding Company?
posted by Catch22 at 7:34 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home